US Senate vote pushes for Pentagon military action in Syria

US Senate vote pushes for Pentagon 

military action in Syria

A soldier of the Air Defence Missile Squadron 2 walk past a Patriot missile launcher in the background in Bad Suelze, northern Germany on December 4, 2012. (AFP Photo/Bernd Wustneck)

The US Senate has voted nearly unanimously to assess military options to cripple the air force of Syrian President Assad. Lawmakers said the action aims to stop the killing of civilians, but critics claim it may herald a Libya-style no-fly zone.

Ninety-two Senators voted to move forward with a Pentagon report on possible military options in Syria, with six opposing the legislation.

The bill in question gives US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta 90 days in which to carry out the study and report back to the Senate with the findings, aimed at “advancing the goals of President Obama of stopping the killing of civilians in Syria and creating conditions for a transition to a democratic, pluralistic, political system in Syria."

The report will detail three military options, including the deployment of Patriot missiles in the Syria-Turkey border zone, the creation of a no-fly zone and the possibility of airstrikes on key government air bases.

During the Senate vote, advocates of the new bill were quick to emphasize that the legislation did not call for the deployment of US ground troops in Syria.

“This amendment is clear that it will not consider ground troops being deployed onto Syrian territory, that it will only look at means that might be used by the United States or allies to stop Assad's reckless, relentless, criminal use of air power to murder his own civilians, his own citizens,” Delaware Senator Chris Coons said.

The Senate stopped short of unanimous support for the bill when some Senators voiced criticisms, prompting a roll-call vote. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul objected, aruging that the legislation could pave the way for greater military involvement in the conflict. He also questioned whether the Syrian opposition was a valid replacement for the embattled President Bashar al-Assad.

“How can we be confident that the opposition will be tolerant, inclusive, peaceful?” Paul said while addressing the Senate. The last no-fly zone, in Libya, yielded a “questionable result,” replacing Moammar Gaddafi with a government that is not pro-American, he said.

A Senate staffer told US publication the Cable that the near-unanimous vote was indicative of “uneasiness and dissatisfaction” towards current policy on Syria and the lack of progress on the ground.

In a show of support for the nascent unified Syrian opposition coalition, Washington is considering classifying Al Nusra, another principal opposition group, as a terrorist organization. The Obama administration was previously reluctant to condemn any Syrian opposition groups, championing them as a viable alternative to President Assad.

US publication McClutchy, who reported on the plans, said that the announcement is likely to precede the first meeting between US diplomats and the new Syrian coalition on December 12.

­

Patriots on the defense

Recently, Western governments have been putting further pressure on the Assad regime over reports that the Syrian government is considering using its chemical weapons.

NATO foreign ministers approved the deployment of Patriot missiles along the Syria-Turkey border on Tuesday at the behest of the Turkish government. The officials stressed that the US-made missiles were strictly for defensive purposes, and that NATO would not support the creation of a no-fly zone or an offensive incursion into the country.

President Obama warned President Assad that the use of chemical weapons would be “unacceptable” and would be met with “consequences.” He did not elaborate on the nature of the consequences.

http://rt.com/news/us-senate-military-syria-305/

Israel's Netanyahu: Palestinian victories at UN 'change nothing'

Anticipating a stinging diplomatic defeat at the United Nations, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that a vote there to upgrade the Palestinians' status to a non-member state would "change nothing," insisting that only negotiations with Israel could bring about Palestinian statehood.

With an overwhelming majority of U.N. General Assembly members expected to endorse the status change Thursday afternoon, and key European nations saying they would either vote yes or abstain, Israeli officials tried to play down the significance of the step, which is opposed by Washington.

Officials here have scaled back threats of tough responses against the Palestinians in the event of a U.N. vote, reflecting concern that such a reaction could leave Israel even more isolated internationally.

"The decision at the U.N. today will change nothing on the ground," Netanyahu said. "It will not advance the establishment of a Palestinian state; it will push it off."

"Peace can only be achieved one way, through direct negotiations between the parties without preconditions, and not through one-sided decisions at the U.N. that totally ignore Israel's vital security needs," Netanyahu said. "I would not be impressed with the applause at the U.N.," he added. "No matter how many fingers are raised against us, there is no force in the world that will get me to compromise on Israel's security."

While conceding that the Palestinians have long had enough votes in the General Assembly to approve a resolution upgrading their U.N. observer status from "entity" to "non-member observer state," Israeli officials had hoped to assemble a "moral majority" of friendly European nations, along with the United States, to vote against the move.

Those hopes were dashed early Thursday, when Germany said it would abstain from voting, a day after Britain suggested it would do the same. France, Italy and Spain have announced that they would endorse the resolution, along with several other European Union nations, including Greece, Belgium and Denmark.

The European stance has been interpreted in Israel as an effort to bolster Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas after the recent Israeli offensive against Hamas in Gaza, which boosted support for the militant Islamist group among Palestinians.

"The fact that the Palestinians can orchestrate and pass a one-sided, anti-Israeli resolution at the United Nations should come as a surprise to no one," said Mark Regev, a spokesman for Netanyahu. "The General Assembly has a history of passing these sort of resolutions with an automatic anti-Israeli majority based on the Arab and nonaligned states and Muslim countries."

Yigal Palmor, a spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, acknowledged that Israel was disappointed with the European response, but said "the General Assembly has rules of its own: they always vote with a huge majority for any kind of Palestinian proposal."

Regev suggested that Israel would respond after the U.N. vote but did not elaborate. "Because this is a clear violation of signed agreements," he said, "you can't expect Israel not to respond in a proportionate way."

Palmor said the response would depend on whether the Palestinians tried to use their new status to act against Israel in other U.N. bodies — for example, by attempting to bring war crimes charges against the Israeli government and military in the International Criminal Court.

"If they make this a platform for more confrontation, then there will be a firm response," Palmor said.

Documents leaked to the media from the Foreign Ministry in recent weeks raised the prospect that Israel might cancel its peace accords with the Palestinians, or even move to topple the Palestinian Authority, in response to actions at the United Nations that it perceived as hostile.

But Palmor said any measures that might be taken, such as financial sanctions, would be "within the framework of existing agreements."

The date of the Palestinian statehood bid carries symbolic importance for both sides, coming on the anniversary of the U.N. General Assembly vote on Nov. 29, 1947, to partition British-ruled Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state, a step that led to the creation of Israel.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israels-netanyahu-palestinian-victories-at-un-change-nothing-8371188.html

WESTERN COUNTRIES/THE ZIONIST ENTITY/SAUDIS DESTROYED SYRIA!

WESTERN COUNTRIES/THE ZIONIST ENTITY/SAUDIS DESTROYED SYRIA!